Association between 7q31 markers and tourette syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tourette syndrome (TS) is a complex neuropychiatric disorder with a strong genetic basis. Although no specific susceptibility genes have been identified for TS, cytogenetic studies in selected cases suggest the existence of a predisposing gene located in the 7q31 chromosomal region. In order to test the hypothesis of a possible relationship between this region and TS at the population level, we undertook a family based association study in a sample of French Canadian patients from Quebec. For this purpose, markers D7S522, D7S523, and D7S1516 were tested using the extended transmission disequilibrium test (e-TDT). Marker D7S522 showed a biased transmission of alleles from heterozygote parents to their TS offsprings (allele-wise TDT chi(2) = 12.61, 4 df, P = 0.013, genotype-wise TDT chi(2) = 15.49, 7 df, P = 0.030). When the analysis was restricted to patients without ADHD or OCD comorbidity, similar results were observed both allele and genotype-wise (chi(2) = 10.68, 4 df, P = 0.03 and chi(2) = 12.55, 5 df, P = 0.028, respectively). In addition, marker D7S523 was also associated (allele-wise TDT chi(2) = 18.37, 7 df, P = 0.01 and genotype-wise TDT chi(2) = 46.26, 17 df, P = 0.00016), and showed a tendency for association in the comorbidity-free subgroup (genotype-wise TDT chi(2) = 18.7, 10 df, P = 0.044). Finally, marker D7S1516, contained in the inner mitochondrial membrane peptidase 2 like (IMMP2L) gene, also showed a tendency for association (genotype-wise TDT chi(2) = 32.87, 21 df, P = 0.048). These results may reflect the proximity of markers D7S522, D7S523, and possibly D7S1516 to a gene or regulatory region relevant to TS predisposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".