Cockayne Syndrome B Protects Against Methamphetamine-Enhanced Oxidative DNA Damage in Murine Fetal Brain and Postnatal Neurodevelopmental Deficits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methamphetamine (METH) increases the oxidative DNA lesion 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) in fetal mouse brain, and causes postnatal motor coordination deficits after in utero exposure. Like oxoguanine glycosylase 1 (OGG1), the Cockayne syndrome B (CSB) protein is involved in the repair of oxidatively damaged DNA, although its function is unclear. Here we used CSB-deficient Csb(m/m) knockout mice to investigate the developmental role of DNA oxidation and CSB in METH-initiated neurodevelopmental deficits. METH (40 mg/kg intraperitoneally) administration to pregnant Csb females on gestational day 17 increased 8-oxoG levels in Csb(m/m) fetal brains (p < 0.05). CSB modulated 8-oxoG levels independent of OGG1 activity, as 8-oxoG incision activity in fetal nuclear extracts was identical in Csb(m/m) and Csb(+/+)mice. This CSB effect was evident despite 7.1-fold higher OGG1 activity in Csb(+/+) mice compared to outbred CD-1 mice. Female Csb(m/m) offspring exposed in utero to METH exhibited motor coordination deficits postnatally (p < 0.05). In utero METH exposure did not cause dopaminergic nerve terminal degeneration, in contrast to adult exposures. This is the first evidence that CSB protects the fetus from xenobiotic-enhanced DNA oxidation and postnatal functional deficits, suggesting that oxidatively damaged DNA is developmentally pathogenic, and that fetal CSB activity may modulate the risk of reactive oxygen species-mediated adverse developmental outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".