MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072031377 · doi:10.4043/25520-ms

Update on Probabilistic Assessment of Multi-year Sea Ice Loads on Vertical-faced Structures

2015· article· en· W2072031377 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Thijssen, Mark Fuglem, K. Muggeridge, Tom Morrison, Paul Spencer

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)Centre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRidgeMonte Carlo methodSea iceProbabilistic logicComputer scienceSoftwareBreakoutMarine engineeringGeologyEngineeringClimatologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Sea Ice Loads Software (SILS) is a Monte-Carlo type simulator developed by C-CORE for determining first and multiyear design sea ice loads, following the ISO 19906 methodology. Due to complexities in ice failure mechanics and associated uncertainties, these models are necessarily empirical or require simplifying assumptions. To account for uncertainty, conservatism must be built into models. A number of improvements to the software have recently been implemented in order to more realistically include a number of model components applicable to multi-year ridge loads and limit forces. This paper provides an overview of new modules accounting for ridge breakout, driving force ramp-up and ridge geometry modeling. Sensitivity runs show that design loads are affected significantly by accounting for these processes, compared to the previous implementation of ISO 19906 in SILS. The objective of this paper is to present the analytical model components and their implementation in SILS, and to demonstrate the influence of the changes by means of a scenario wherein a vertical sided structure encounters multi-year level ice and ridges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207