Vehicle navigator using a mixture particle filter for inertial sensors/odometer/map data/GPS integration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The market for vehicular navigators boomed over the last few years. These navigators rely mainly on satellite based navigation systems such as the Global Positioning System (GPS) to assist drivers. Due to interruption or degradation in such systems in dense urban scenarios, they have to be augmented with other systems to achieve continuous and accurate vehicular navigation. GPS is integrated with low-cost micro-electro mechanical system (MEMS)-based inertial sensors. However, these sensors provide inadequate performance in degraded GPS environments because of their complex error characteristics that often lead to large position drift errors. This paper proposes a continuous and accurate solution integrating low-cost MEMS-based inertial sensors, the vehicle odometer, GPS, and map data from road networks. Despite the traditional inadequate performance of MEMS-based sensors in this problem, the performance is enhanced through: (i) a special combination of inertial sensors and odometer that has better performance for land vehicles than traditional solutions; (ii) The use of map information from road networks to constrain the positioning solution; (iii) The use of an advanced particle filtering (PF) technique to perform the integration, which work with nonlinear models and better modeling of inertial sensor errors, in addition to better integration with the map data. The performance of the proposed positioning system has been verified extensively on real road tests in downtown trajectories with degraded or totally denied GPS for long durations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it