MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072045906 · doi:10.1145/1458082.1458187

Fast correlation analysis on time series datasets

2008· article· en· W2072045906 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Computer scienceTime seriesCorrelationData miningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been increasing interest for efficient techniques for fast correlation analysis of time series data in different application domains. We present three algorithms for (1) bivariate correlation queries, (2) multivariate correlation queries, and (3) correlation queries based on a new correlation measure we introduce using dynamic time warping. To support these algorithms, we use a variant of the Compact Multi-Resolution Index (CMRI). In addition to conventional nearest neighbor and range queries supported by CMRI, the proposed algorithms compute all answers to user-defined, ad hoc and parametric correlation queries. The results of our experiments indicate a speed-up of two orders of magnitude over the brute force algorithm, and an order of magnitude improvement on average, while offering more functionalities than provided by existing techniques such as StatStream and the Spatial Cone Tree.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207