Normal Aging Impairs Upregulation of the Beta-adrenergic but not the Alpha-Adrenergic Response: Aging and Adrenergic Upregulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine if centrally reducing sympathetic tone with clonidine will reverse the downregulation in the alpha-adrenergic (alphaAR) and beta-adrenergic (betaAR) responses seen with normal aging. METHODS: Twelve rigorously screened young adult (mean age, 26 years) and 15 older adult (mean age, 69 years) subjects were studied before and after using the clonidine patch (TTS-2) for 2 weeks. betaAR (isoproterenol at 35 ng/kg/min) and alphaAR (phenylephrine at 1.0 microg/kg/min) were assessed using radionuclide measures of end diastolic, end systolic, and stroke volume indices, cardiac index, and ejection fraction. RESULTS: Clonidine reduced resting plasma norepinephrine and this reduction was greater in older subjects (-47 +/- 3 versus -26 +/- 6%, P = 0.001). After 2 weeks of clonidine patch, upregulation of the betaAR was significantly higher in young subjects for heart rate (+10.7 +/- 1.5 versus +4.6 +/- 1.5 bpm; P = 0.01). There was no significant age-associated difference in the upregulation of the alphaAR with clonidine for systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure or systemic vascular resistance. CONCLUSIONS: With aging, there is an impaired resensitization of the chronotropic betaAR response with central sympathetic downregulation that is not seen with the alphaAR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".