MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072060953 · doi:10.1080/08957950903484410

Molecular dynamics simulations of oil components at geological conditions

2009· article· en· W2072060953 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh Pressure Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
FundersUniversidad del ValleWestern Canada Research GridUniversity of the Fraser Valley
KeywordsOctadecaneMolecular dynamicsDodecaneThermodynamicsWork (physics)Bar (unit)HexadecaneChemistryMaterials scienceChemical physicsComputational chemistryPhysicsMeteorologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern methods of computational chemistry, including molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics of molecular systems, allow one to obtain accurate values of structural parameters and physicochemical properties of complex systems for a wide range of temperatures and pressures without resorting to experiment. In this work, we explore the effects of physical conditions on densities and viscosities of typical petroleum components, including hexane, octane, dodecane, and octadecane, for temperatures and pressures ranging from ambient conditions (298 K, 1 bar) to geophysical conditions of the upper mantle (2000 K, 60 kbar). Theoretical results are compared with the experimental data and show good agreement in the case of densities and somewhat poorer agreement for viscosities (diffusion coefficients).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it