Short-Course Therapy of Gemifloxacin Effective Against Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Standard 7-14 day (d) courses of antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are thought to have contributed to the emergence of resistant pneumoccoci. Consequently, short-course fluoroquinolone regimens have been proposed to minimize resistance. To test this, we examined 2-day versus 5-day regimens of gemifloxacin and levofloxacin for treatment of pneumonia in a murine model. In doing so, we also investigated whether the enhanced potency of gemifloxacin would influence outcomes. CD1 Swiss mice were infected intratracheally with 10(5)-CFU of a virulent Streptococcus pneumoniae strain. Drugs were administered every 8 h for 2 d and 5 d, starting at 24 h postinfection. Temperature was used to assess disease progression. Gemifloxacin remained effective for 2 d and 5 d, with survival rates of 100%-83% compared with 40%-58% for levofloxacin. Eighty-nine to 100% of gemifloxacin-treated mice were clear of pulmonary bacteria compared with only 0%-20% for levofloxacin. For levofloxacin-treated mice, 2 of 7 (29%) isolates with a levofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 4 times that of the infecting parent strain had ParC mutations. By contrast, no isolates recovered from gemifloxacin-treated mice were reduced in susceptibility. Gemifloxacin could be effective in shortening duration of therapy for CAP treatment as well as minimize resistance development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".