MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072082040 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450810524

Closed‐loop Fault Detection Using the Local Approach

2003· article· en· W2072082040 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Luke L. Cheng, K.E. Kwok, Biao Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault detection and isolationComputer scienceParametric statisticsClosed loopProcess (computing)Reliability (semiconductor)Loop (graph theory)Fault (geology)Control theory (sociology)Control engineeringControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fault detection and isolation (FDI) has become a crucial issue for industrial process monitoring in order to increase availability, reliability and production safety. Model‐based FDI methods rely on a mathematical model and input‐output data of a process to perform detection. The local approach is a new model‐based FDI method that aims to detect slight changes of a system's parametric properties. Closed‐loop detection is an important issue for the local approach since all control systems work under closed‐loop conditions. A new algorithm was proposed to revise the original detection algorithm in order to make it work for closed‐loop data. Simulation results show that the proposed method can detect the changes of parameters of a system that can affect closed‐loop performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207