Hybridité linguistique et culturelle dans les écritures migrantes au Québec: L’identité de la traversée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie les configurations et les traits distinctifs de l’hybridité linguistique et culturelle dans les écritures migrantes au Québec. Dans la première partie, il se focalise sur le métissage linguistique comme réceptacle de mémoires et moteur de sensations et comme traduction de l’éclatement de l’identité. Dans la deuxième partie, il aborde l’hybridité culturelle des écritures migrantes associée au territoire spatial et symbolique, au discours de l’“itinérance identitaire” (Ouellet 2002), de “l’enracinerrance” (Robin 2004), de la (re)naissance. La dernière partie est consacrée à l’étude des écrivains migrants comme passeurs de langues, des “ouvreurs de mots” (Ollivier 1999), comme passeurs de mémoires (mémoires de la “migrance,” de l’esclavage, de la guerre et de la répression), comme bâtisseurs d’hybridité et “écrivains de frontière” (Ollivier 2001).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".