MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072138509 · doi:10.3151/jact.8.59

Reinforced Concrete Panels Subjected to Uniaxial and Biaxial Tension

2010· article· en· W2072138509 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Concrete Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCrackingMaterials scienceReinforcementStructural engineeringUltimate tensile strengthTension (geology)Reinforced solidReinforced concreteComposite materialTransverse planeBar (unit)EngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the pre- and post cracking behavior and tensile response of concrete panels subjected to axial tension. The main objective of this investigation is to study the stress-strain relationship of thick reinforced concrete plates, taking into consideration the effect of the steel reinforcement in both directions, as the thick concrete panels are well used in offshore concrete structures and nuclear power plant construction. A theoretical model for predicting the cracking behavior, which includes the crack spacing and width of reinforced concrete panels under axial loading at any given loading stage, is developed. In this theoretical model, the main parameters that influence the cracking behavior of concrete in both directions are considered. The behavior of two-way reinforced concrete plate is analyzed with consideration of the effect of concrete tensile strength, reinforcement ratio, bar diameter and spacing in both longitudinal and transverse directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it