MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

C5a plays a role in PMN infiltration into the DSS inflamed colonic mucosa

2008· article· en· W207214862 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew W. Stadnyk, Reem Rostom, Shukkur M. Farooq, RoseMarie Stillie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCrohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada
KeywordsSubmucosaColitisInfiltration (HVAC)CryptInflammationMedicinePathologyIntestinal mucosaImmunologyImmunohistochemistryLamina propriaInternal medicineEpithelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A role for complement in colitis has been implicated yet it is unclear whether it promotes or possibly inhibits inflammation. As C5a is a potent PMN chemoattractant and PMN infiltrate the mucosa during dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) colitis, we hypothesized that C5aR−/− mice would experience less colitis due to reduced PMN infiltration. Balb/c and C5aR−/− mice were fed 5% DSS in their drinking water for 5 days then were euthanised on day 6 and their colons examined. Balb/c mice experienced limited clinical illness. Their mid‐colons were inflamed with PMN infiltrates in the mucosa, crypt loss, and small focal ulcers. In contrast, C5aR−/− mice experienced a more severe colitis, with greater ulcers, but interestingly PMN remained primarily in the submucosa. Staining for F4/80 indicated that a substantially greater number of macrophages infiltrated the C5aR−/− colon versus the Balb/c mice. In order to rule‐out the possibility that PMN were damaging the colon from the submucosa, C5aR−/− mice receiving DSS were made neutropenic using injections of Gr‐1 antibody. Despite abolishing PMN infiltration, these mice still demonstrated high numbers of mucosal F4/80+ cells and colon damage. Thus while C5a does play a role in PMN recruitment into the mucosa, our hypothesis was incorrect and C5aR−/− mice in fact experience heightened colitis, with macrophages possibly mediating the inflammation. Supported by the CCFC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207