Anesthetic Treatment Blocks Synaptogenesis But Not Neuronal Regeneration of Cultured<i>Lymnaea</i>Neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trauma and injury necessitate the use of various surgical interventions, yet such procedures themselves are invasive and often interrupt synaptic communications in the nervous system. Because anesthesia is required during surgery, it is important to determine whether long-term exposure of injured nervous tissue to anesthetics is detrimental to regeneration of neuronal processes and synaptic connections. In this study, using identified molluscan neurons, we provide direct evidence that the anesthetic propofol blocks cholinergic synaptic transmission between soma-soma paired Lymnaea neurons in a dose-dependent and reversible manner. These effects do not involve presynaptic secretory machinery, but rather postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors were affected by the anesthetic. Moreover, we discovered that long-term (18-24 h) anesthetic treatment of soma-soma paired neurons blocked synaptogenesis between these cells. However, after several hours of anesthetic washout, synapses developed between the neurons in a manner similar to that seen in vivo. Long-term anesthetic treatment of the identified neurons visceral dorsal 4 (VD4) and left pedal dorsal 1 (LPeD1) and the electrically coupled Pedal A cluster neurons (PeA) did not affect nerve regeneration in cell culture as the neurons continued to exhibit extensive neurite outgrowth. However, these sprouted neurons failed to develop chemical (VD4 and LPeD1) and electrical (PeA) synapses as observed in their control counterparts. After drug washout, appropriate synapses did reform between the cells, although this synaptogenesis required several days. Taken together, this study provides the first direct evidence that the clinically used anesthetic propofol does not affect nerve regeneration. However, the formation of both chemical and electrical synapses is severely compromised in the presence of this drug. This study emphasizes the importance of short-term anesthetic treatment, which may be critical for the restoration of synaptic connections between injured neurons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".