MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072161181 · doi:10.1103/physreve.72.021803

Hole growth in freely standing polystyrene films probed using a differential pressure experiment

2005· article· en· W2072161181 on OpenAlexafffund
Connie Roth, John Dutcher

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolystyreneDifferential pressureMaterials scienceDifferential (mechanical device)MechanicsComposite materialPhysicsThermodynamicsPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have probed the whole chain mobility of polymer molecules confined to freely standing films by measuring the flow of gas through holes growing in the films at elevated temperatures using a differential pressure experiment. Freely standing polystyrene films were measured for the temperature range $92\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}\mathrm{C}<T<105\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}\mathrm{C}$ for films with two different molecular weights ${M}_{w}=717\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{3}$ and $2240\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{3}$, with thicknesses $51\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}<h<97\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$. This range of film thicknesses is of particular interest because large reductions in the glass transition temperature ${T}_{g}$ have been measured previously for freely standing PS films in this thickness range. We find that hole formation and growth, and therefore substantial chain mobility, does not occur until temperatures close to the bulk value of the glass transition temperature ${T}_{g}^{\text{bulk}}$. The characteristic growth times $\ensuremath{\tau}$ for the thinnest films, which have reduced values of ${T}_{g}$, are not substantially less than those for thicker films, and we find that these small differences in $\ensuremath{\tau}$ can be understood in terms of the bulk phenomenon of shear thinning. We also show that the viscosity at the edge of the hole inferred from the characteristic growth times obtained in this and previous studies exhibit shear thinning with reduced shear strain rates $\ensuremath{\beta}$ that span twelve orders of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207