Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Small, medium and large seed sizes of the groundnut genotypes Spancross (a released variety) and 2/91 (a breeding line) were assessed for growth and yield under field conditions in 1996 and 1997. In 1997, there were significant effects of cultivar and seed size on shoot and root biomass. The shoot dry matter for large seeds was 36% and 24% greater than for small seeds of Spancross and 2/91 respectively. Large seeds of 2/91 showed a significant increase of 26% in root biomass but Spancross recorded a decline of 8% over small seeds. Generally, productivity increased with seed size. In 1996, rainfall was low and varietal differences were significant, with 2/91 giving significantly higher kernel yields (2082 kg/ha) than Spancross (1498 kg/ha) when averaged across seed size. Copyright © 2003 Whurr Publishers Ltd
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it