MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072172513 · doi:10.1021/jp0462207

An Example Where Orbital Relaxation Is an Important Contribution to the Fukui Function

2005· article· en· W2072172513 on OpenAlex
Libero J. Bartolotti, Paul W. Ayers

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFukui functionAtomic orbitalReactivity (psychology)Relaxation (psychology)Computational chemistryMoleculeMolecular orbitalDensity functional theoryElectronic structureIonElectronQuantum mechanicsPhysicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Density-functional electronic structure calculations are performed on the molecules Cr2(hpp)4, Mo2(hpp)4, and W2(hpp)4, where the bridging ligand, hpp, is the anion of 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-2H-pyrimido[1,2-a]pyrimidine. The calculated electronic densities are used to determine the Fukui functions. These molecules are unique not only in their ability as electron donors but also because orbital relaxation plays a decisive role in their reactivity. Unlike other examples in the literature, the reactivity of these compounds cannot be expressed solely in terms of the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied Kohn-Sham orbitals but only using the Fukui function, which includes the effects of orbital relaxation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it