MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072183894 · doi:10.1117/1.1543158

Invariant object recognition under three-dimensional rotations and changes of scale

2003· article· en· W2072183894 on OpenAlexafffund
Se ́bastien Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInvariant (physics)Artificial intelligenceCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionCentroidComputer visionComputer science3D single-object recognitionScale spaceRotation (mathematics)Scale invariancePattern recognition (psychology)Classifier (UML)Feature extractionMathematicsImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research on object recognition invariant under out-of-plane rotations has so far yielded limited results. The problem becomes even more complex when in addition scale changes must also be taken into account. We develop a new object recognition method invariant to translations, rotations, changes of pose, and scale. The method is based on angular wedge sampling about the centroid of the object, yielding translation-, rotation-, and scale-invariant features. A modified feature space trajectory classifier is used to obtain out-of-plane rotation invariance. The method is successfully tested on models of military land vehicles and is optically implementable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical EngineeringSame topicImage and Object Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207