MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072201119 · doi:10.7202/024940ar

Quand un pauvre diable est prince de ce monde ou le scandale de Satan selon René Girard

2007· article· fr· W2072201119 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jean-Marc Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicViolence, Religion, and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satan et ses démons habitent l'univers religieux depuis des millénaires. Le questionnement théologique à leur sujet appelle une déconstruction anthropologique. C'est ce que fait René Girard quand il relit les évangiles à la lumière de la théorie mimétique. Satan y apparaît comme la fausse transcendance des rapports sociaux de rivalité conduisant à la violence sacrée. Cette démystification du monde satanique est déjà présent dans les évangiles à travers le langage du skandalon. Le scandaleux Satan est démystifié par le scandale de la croix. Croire en l'Evangile, c'est aussi refuser de croire en Satan en le renvoyant à son illusion mystificatrice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThéologiquesSame topicViolence, Religion, and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207