MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072243206 · doi:10.1109/embc.2013.6610053

Low noise and high CMRR front-end amplifier dedicated to portable EEG acquisition system

2013· article· en· W2072243206 on OpenAlexaff
R. Chebli, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreamplifierCommon-mode rejection ratioCMOSChopperAmplifierElectrical engineeringComputer scienceElectronic engineeringAnalog front-endNoise (video)EngineeringVoltageOperational amplifierArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper concerns the design and implementation of a fully integrated low noise and high CMRR rail-to-rail preamplifier dedicated to EEG acquisition channel. The preamplification technique is based on two complementary CMOS True Logarithmic Amplifier (TLA) stages connected in parallel. The TLA largely amplifies small amplitude of EEG signals, and moderately the large amplitude ones created during epileptic. A chopper stabilization technique is used to filter the 1/ƒ noise and the DC offset voltage of the input CMOS transistors and to increase the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR). Due to the TLA structure, a high CMRR and high power supply rejection ratio are achieved and the signal-to-noise ratio (of the channel is better enhanced). To snugly fit the ADC input window to the EEG signal magnitude a new programming gain approach is implemented. Also, a chopper spike filter is used to cancel the spike voltages generated by the charge injections of modulator/demodulator switches. The proposed preamplifier is implemented in 0.18 µm CMOS technology. Post-layout simulation results exhibit 253 dB @50/60 Hz as CMRR, 500 nVrms @100 Hz as input-referred noise while consuming 55 µA from a 1.8 V supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207