Evaluation of portable high-frequency sonars for diver identification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obtaining a positive identification is a critical step in most tiered harbour protection strategies for countering underwater intruders. It is generally recognised that sonar is one of the best tools for underwater imaging, however operating in a harbour environment presents challenges. As part of an on-going harbour protection research project, small easily portable high-frequency sonar systems are being investigated as a means to equip small response craft with intruder identification capability. Several systems are being considered, with the most comprehensive testing by DRDC to date being done on small Canadian-made sonars. Tests were conducted in local harbour waters in Halifax, Canada, and in La Spezia, Italy, through participation in the NATO Undersea Research Centre Response Against Diver Intrusions (RADI) joint trial, conducted in November 2007. A variety of small sonars and manned and unmanned response craft were used during the RADI trial. Evaluation of the performance of these devices for the task of diver identification in realistic conditions will be discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".