Damage control – a possible non‐proteolytic role for ubiquitin in limiting neurodegeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ubiquitin can be detected in the neuronal and glial inclusions that are the diagnostic hallmarks of a number of human neurodegenerative diseases. It has been assumed that the presence of ubiquitin signifies the failed attempt of the cell to remove abnormal protein structures, which have been allowed to aggregate. The burden of abnormal protein arising from genetic mutations or cumulative oxidative damage might in the course of time overwhelm the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (whose responsibility it is to eliminate misfolded or damaged proteins). However, ubiquitin may still serve a protective purpose distinct from its role in proteolysis. The physical properties of ubiquitin are such that a surface coating of ubiquitin should preclude further growth of the aggregate, prevent non-productive interactions, and conceal the contents from detection mechanisms that might ultimately kill the cell. This 'nonstick coating' hypothesis makes predictions about the nature of the conjugated ubiquitin and the consequences of removing it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".