MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072257398 · doi:10.1094/pd-90-0832a

Strains of <i>Leptosphaeria maculans</i> with the Capacity to Cause Crown Canker on <i>Brassica carinata</i> are Present in Western Australia

2006· article· en· W2072257398 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ravjit Khangura, Mehreteab Aberra

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptosphaeria maculansBlacklegBiologyBrassica carinataCankerCanolaBrassicaInoculationHorticultureCultivarConidiumAgronomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blackleg, caused by Leptosphaeria maculans (Desm.) Ces. et de Not., is the most important disease of canola (Brassica napus L.) in Australia, Europe, Canada, and North America (2). During the early 1990s, new cultivars of canola with resistance to blackleg were released in Australia. Despite good adult-plant resistance, these cultivars still suffered significant yield losses from blackleg under high disease pressure. Potential new sources of blackleg resistance such as B. nigra L., B. carinata L., and Sinapis alba L. are being evaluated. B. carinata is believed to be highly resistant to blackleg by virtue of its B-genome. However, some L. maculans isolates that can attack B. carinata have been reported from Germany (1). During the 2003 growing season, 22 isolates of L. maculans were collected from different canola-growing areas of Western Australia and tested for their reaction on 24 seedlings of each of various Brassica genotypes, including B. carinata, in a controlled environment chamber. Twenty-four seeds per genotype were sown in 100-ml plastic pots (12 seeds per pot) and both cotyledons of 10-day-old seedlings were wound inoculated with a conidial suspension (1 × 107 conidia/ml) of each isolate of L. maculans. Disease assessments were made 2 weeks after inoculation. The majority of isolates induced a noninvasive hypersensitive reaction on B. carinata without pycnidial development. However, four of the isolates caused lesions with abundant pycnidia on B. carinata cotyledons. The lesion size ranged between 3 and 7 mm and appeared similar to that on susceptible B. napus cultivars. B. carinata seedlings were grown for another 8 weeks in a glasshouse, and crown cankers were observed from plants inoculated with three of the four seedling virulent isolates. The severity of crown cankers as percent of stem circumference (percent disease index) ranged between 20 and 54%. Twenty-five stem pieces from mature B. carinata plants infected with one of the three isolates were plated on V8 juice agar and L. maculans was recovered from 70% of pieces. Abundant pycnidia were also observed on these stem pieces. These results have important implications for using B. carinata as a source of blackleg resistance in canola breeding. To our knowledge, this is the first report of L. maculans isolates with the capacity to induce crown cankers on B. carinata in Australia. References: (1) C. Sjöidin and K. Glimelius. J. Phytopathol. 123:322, 1988. (2) J. West et al. Plant Pathol. 51:454, 2002.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207