MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072261063 · doi:10.2118/2006-126

Prediction of SAGD Performance Using Response Surface Correlations Developed by Experimental Design Techniques

2006· article· en· W2072261063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsResponse surface methodologySurface (topology)Computer sciencePetroleum engineeringGeologyMathematicsMachine learningGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Over 80% of the vast reserves of Alberta's Oil Sands can be produced only by using in-situ recovery methods. Among them, one which is likely the most efficient and important is the steamassisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process. Numerical simulation allows the ideal way of predicting reservoir performance under SAGD process during the whole field development cycle. However, in the earlier stages of development studies when it is necessary to make preliminary engineering design, estimate reserves, screen among other SAGD prospects, as well as consider the uncertainty of some reservoir parameters, it may not be feasible to do a detailed simulation study, due to high computational time involved in a SAGD process simulation. Under these circumstances, a method of predicting reservoir performance using a simple statistical model, that can approximate the reservoir simulator over a given range of some important input parameters, is a good approach to provide means of comparison and preliminary predictions without resorting to numerical simulation. The purpose of this work is to use Experimental Design Techniques to develop a response surface that can predict SAGD performance without the expense of doing simulation. A preliminary screening study was done in order to select the most influential variables on the SAGD performance The variables used for that purpose include reservoir rock/fluid properties such as reservoir thickness, porosity, vertical permeability, vertical-horizontal permeability ratio, methane content, rock thermal conductivity, initial oil saturation and bitumen viscosity; along with SAGD design and operating variables including: spacing between injector/producer, operating pressure, preheating period, maximum steam injection rate and SAGD well pattern spacing. In a second stage the influential variables were used to create a statistically significant correlation, by using the experimental design method and response surface techniques. This simple model allows the prediction of the SAGD performance in terms of maximum Net Present Value over 15 years of project life, for a given range of the most influential parameters. Introduction Numerical simulation of complex systems such as SAGD processes require high computational times due to the compositional nature and transient temperature behavior of the models used in the solution. Bigger simulation times lead either to delay the making decision process or to make decisions without a complete screening of all possible scenarios in which the field can be developed. This is particularly important at the earliest field development stages. In other words, although the ideal way to predict reservoir performance under SAGD, in any stage of the field development cycle, is through numerical simulation, in early stages when the lack of knowledge of some reservoir or operational parameters is a constant, a detailed simulation study where all possible scenarios should be considered leads to prohibitive simulation times, making it a very difficult and highly expensive task. To overcome that situation, engineers need simple models to predict SAGD performance. A first step to make it possible is by selecting among a given set of input parameters those ones which have the most influential effect on the SAGD performance. To achieve this purpose efficiently, it is necessary a methodology to choose the proper simulation runs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it