MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072261359 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.017002

Shrinking Magnetic Vortices in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:math>due to Delocalized Quasiparticle Core States: Confirmation of the Microscopic Theory for Interacting Vortices

2004· article· lv· W2072261359 on OpenAlexaff
J. E. Sonier, F. D. Callaghan, R. I. Miller, E. Boaknin, Louis Taillefer, R. F. Kiefl, J. H. Brewer, K. F. Poon, J. D. Brewer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVortexQuasiparticlePhysicsSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsDelocalized electronQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report muon-spin rotation measurements on the conventional type-II superconductor ${\mathrm{V}}_{3}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{i}$ that provide clear evidence for changes to the inner structure of a vortex due to the delocalization of bound quasiparticle core states. The experimental findings described here confirm a key prediction of recent microscopic theories describing interacting vortices. The effects of vortex-vortex interactions on the magnetic and electronic structure of the vortex state are of crucial importance to the interpretation of experiments on both conventional and exotic superconductors in an applied magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207