MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072292386 · doi:10.1086/338899

Environment, Ram Pressure, and Shell Formation in Holmberg II

2002· article· en· W2072292386 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Bureau, C. Carignan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalaxy rotation curvePhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyRotation (mathematics)StarsLight curveGalaxy formation and evolutionGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutral hydrogen VLA D-array observations of the dwarf irregular galaxy HoII, a prototype galaxy for studies of shell formation, are presented. HI is detected to radii over 16' or 4 R_25, and M_HI=6.44x10^8 M_sun. The total HI map has a comet-like appearance suggesting that HoII is affected by ram pressure from an intragroup medium (IGM). A rotation curve corrected for asymmetric drift was derived and an analysis of the mass distribution yields a total mass 6.3x10^9 M_sun, of which about 80% is dark. HoII lies northeast of the M81 group's core, along with Kar52 (M81dwA) and UGC4483. No signs of interaction are observed and it is argued that HoII is part of the NGC2403 subgroup, infalling towards M81. A case is made for ram pressure stripping and an IGM in the M81 group. Stripping of the disk outer parts would require an IGM density n_IGM>=4.0x10^-6 atoms/cm^3 at the location of HoII. This corresponds to 1% of the virial mass of the group uniformly distributed over a volume just enclosing HoII and is consistent with the X-ray properties of small groups. It is argued that existing observations of HoII do not support self-propagating star formation scenarios, whereby the HI holes and shells are created by supernova explosions and stellar winds. Many HI holes are located in low surface density regions of the disk, where no star formation is expected or observed. Ram pressure has the capacity to enlarge preexisting holes and lower their creation energies, helping to bridge the gap between the observed star formation rate and that required to create the holes. (abridged)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations133
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207