MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072298860 · doi:10.1021/cr900236h

Activatable Photosensitizers for Imaging and Therapy

2010· review· en· W2072298860 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jonathan F. Lovell, Tracy Liu, Juan Chen, Gang Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCitationSocial mediaAltmetricsLibrary scienceComputer scienceNanotechnologyWorld Wide WebMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTActivatable Photosensitizers for Imaging and TherapyJonathan F. Lovell†, Tracy W. B. Liu‡, Juan Chen‡, and Gang Zheng*†‡View Author Information Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering and Department of Medical Biophysics, Ontario Cancer Institute, University of Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]†Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering.‡Department of Medical Biophysics.Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5, 2839–2857Publication Date (Web):January 27, 2010Publication History Received1 July 2009Published online27 January 2010Published inissue 12 May 2010https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr900236hhttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr900236hreview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2010 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views19425Altmetric-Citations1445LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Fluorescence,Oxygen,Peptides and proteins,Photosensitization,Quenching Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,706
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ReviewsSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207