MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072334110 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.633

WLC04-1: A Distributed BER-Based Power Control Algorithm for WCDMA Systems

2006· article· en· W2072334110 on OpenAlexaff
Gaurav P. Mandhare, Ali Ghrayeb

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobecom · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower controlComputer scienceSignal-to-interference ratioBit error rateTelecommunications linkTransmitter power outputCode division multiple accessInterference (communication)Quality of serviceSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)AlgorithmSpread spectrumConvergence (economics)Power (physics)Real-time computingElectronic engineeringComputer networkEngineeringTelecommunicationsTransmitterDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking into consideration the dominance of the multiple access interference (MAI) in spread spectrum based CDMA systems, power control plays a vital role in reducing the system interference and helps in increasing the capacity of the system while maintaining the quality of the received signal. Closed loop power control is mainly used to mitigate the near-far effect in the uplink direction. In this paper, we propose a bit error rate (BER)-based first order distributed power control algorithm. Being distributed, the proposed algorithm has the flexibility of using the benefits of fast closed loop power control and thus can be used to update the transmit power of a single user at a time. Signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) based algorithms are in extensive use. But considering that the SIR is time variant, the BER would be a better quality of service (QoS) parameter because it can be easily measured using already known pilot bits. We analyze the convergence performance of the proposed algorithm and show that its convergence is always guaranteed. We demonstrate that a considerable improvement in the convergence speed along with the required average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is achieved as compared with other BER-based algorithms under comparison. We also show that the proposed algorithm performs well at different mobile speeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobecomSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207