MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072342039 · doi:10.2118/131626-ms

An Effective Stimulation Fluid for Deep Carbonate Reservoirs: A Core Flood Study

2010· article· en· W2072342039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolomiteCarbonateEthylenediaminetetraacetic acidChelationCalcium carbonateAnkeriteChemistryCalciteGeologyAnhydriteMineralogyInorganic chemistryGypsumOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Matrix acidizing is used to remove near wellbore damage and create channels or wormholes in carbonate formations to improve well performance. The use of conventional matrix acidizing fluids with HCl is not effective in some cases because of the rapid acid spending. Previous studies have demonstrated the use of chelates such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and N-hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA) as alternatives for HCl to stimulate carbonate reservoirs. A recently introduced chelating agent was examined to stimulate deep carbonate reservoirs. This chelating agent can be used at very low injection rates to avoid fracturing the target zone during the treatment, which may occur if HCl is used at high flow rates. The chelating agent used in this study was glutamic acid-N, N-diacetic acid (GLDA). Two sets of calcium carbonate cores were used one with 1.5 in. diameter and 20 in. length and the other set was 1.5 in. diameter and 6 in. length. Calcium carbonate cores such as Indiana limestone cores were used in this study. A dolomite core 1.5 in. diameter and 6 in. length was used to investigate the ability of this chelating agent to stimulate dolomite cores. The cores were treated with GLDA at various pH (1.7–13) and temperatures (180–300°F). The concentrations of dissolved calcium, magnesium, and GLDA in the core effluent were measured for material balance determination. GLDA was found to be highly effective in creating wormholes over a wide range of pH (1.7–13) in calcite cores. Increasing temperature enhanced the reaction rate, more calcite was dissolved, and larger wormholes were formed for different pH with smaller volumes of GLDA solutions. In addition, GLDA was very effective in creating wormholes in the dolomite core as it is a good chelate for magnesium. GLDA was found to be equally effective in creating wormholes in short and long cores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it