Folding pathway for partially folded rabbit muscle creatine kinase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rabbit muscle creatine kinase (CK) was modified by 5,5'-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) accompanied by 3 M guanidine hydrochloride denaturation to produce a partially folded state with modified thiol groups. The partially folded CK was in a monomeric state detected by size exclusion chromatography, native-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, circular dichroism, and intrinsic fluorescence studies. After dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment, about 70% CK activity was regained with a two-phase kinetic course. Rate constants calculated for regaining of activity and refolding were compared with those for CK modified with various treatments to show that refolding and recovery of activity were synchronized. To further characterize the partially folded CK state and its folding pathway, the molecular chaperone GroEL was used to evaluate whether it can bind with partly folded CK during refolding, and 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonate was used to detect the hydrophobic surface of the monomeric state of CK. The monomeric state of CK did not bind with GroEL, although it had a larger area of hydrophobic surface relative to the native state. These results may provide different evidence for the structural requirement of GroEL recognition to the substrate protein compared with previously reported results that GroEL bound with substrate proteins mainly through hydrophobic surface. The present study provides data for a monomeric intermediate trapped by the modification of the SH groups during the refolding of CK. Schemes are given for explaining both the partial folding CK pathway and the refolding pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".