MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072349549 · doi:10.1039/c4nr07207c

Tridentate benzylthiols on Au(111): control of self-assembly geometry

2015· article· en· W2072349549 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed A. Mezour, Iryna I. Perepichka, Oleksandr Ivasenko, R. Bruce Lennox, Dmitrii F. Perepichka

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenzeneChemistryThiolCrystallographyStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A set of hexasubstituted benzene derivatives with three thiol groups in the 1, 3, 5 positions and varied aliphatic substituents in the 2, 4, 6 positions (Me3-BTMT, Et3-BTMT, ODe3-BTMT) has been synthesized and self-assembled on Au(111). The resulting self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) are characterized by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and electrochemistry. The molecular orientation and long-range order are affected by the “gear effect” of the hexasubstituted benzene ring and van der Waals interactions between the physisorbed alkyl chains drive. Me3-BTMT adopts a standing up orientation which results in the highest molecular surface density but also the lowest degree of chemisorption (1 to 2 Au–S bonds per molecule). In contrast, Et3-BTMT favors a lying down orientation with a greater number of surface-bonded thiol groups (2 to 3) per molecule, associated with the peculiar geometry of this molecule. Finally, ODe3-BTMT adsorbs mainly in a lying down orientation, forming the SAM with the highest degree of chemisorption (all thiol groups are gold-bonded) and the lowest molecular areal density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207