Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 19 juin 1986 le Parlement a approuvé une nouvelle Loi sur la concurrence qui refonde et amende la loi réglementant la compétition au Canada. Malgré les objectifs louables qui ont présidé à l’élaboration de cette loi, elle comporte des problèmes potentiels dans son application. Ces problèmes, en effet, proviennent du fait que son diagnostic de l’état de la concurrence sur un marché est dérivé, en grande partie, de la vision statique de la concurrence épousée par les économistes au lieu de la vision dynamique de la concurrence des hommes d’affaires. Le point que nous allons élaborer dans cet article est que pour faire un diagnostic exact de la concurrence sur un marché, on doit considérer une mesure de l’innovation des entreprises oeuvrant sur ce marché, lorsqu’on considère « innovation » dans le sens large du terme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.069 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".