MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072368099 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2012.0491

Convolutional doubly orthogonal codes over <i>GF</i> ( <i>q</i> )

2013· article· en· W2072368099 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Hua Shen, David Haccoun, Christian Cardinal

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGF(2)Convolutional codeComputer scienceMathematicsCombinatoricsAlgorithmFinite fieldDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convolutional doubly orthogonal (CDO) codes constitute a recent group of binary error correcting codes for additive white gaussian noise channel, achieving very good error performance at moderate values of E b / N 0 under the threshold decoding algorithm. Inspired by the low‐density parity‐check codes over the finite fields, this study extends the construction and decoding of single shift register CDO codes from binary field to the finite fields GF ( q ) for q &gt; 2, referred to as the q ‐ary CDO codes. The threshold decoding algorithm is modified to accommodate the decoding requirement for this set of codes. Superior error performance has been observed for q ‐ary CDO codes over their binary counterparts, especially in the error floor region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207