MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072385462 · doi:10.1002/fld.2158

A volume‐based discrete test filter for conducting large eddy simulations with application to physiological flow in a constricted tube

2009· article· en· W2072385462 on OpenAlexafffund
Fereshteh Bahramian, Anthony G. Straatman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTurbulenceFilter (signal processing)Large eddy simulationFlow (mathematics)Interpolation (computer graphics)MechanicsMathematicsAlgorithmComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)SimulationPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A discrete test‐filtering operation that takes advantage of a volume‐averaging procedure, as opposed to the more popular line‐interpolation technique, has been developed to enable mixed‐scale and dynamic LES simulations on general unstructured grids. Simulations of fully developed turbulent flow in a square duct show that the proposed test filter gives the results of similar accuracy to the best modern filters developed for non‐uniform orthogonal grids, but a second‐order correction is required to produce solutions of sufficient accuracy. The discrete filter technique is also used to simulate stationary and pulsatile turbulent flow in a 75% constricted tube, in which the flow undergoes transition to turbulence. Comparisons to previous published results confirm that the results obtained using the proposed discrete test filter are in a good agreement with the existing experimental and numerical results. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207