MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072399505 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2014.7037538

MPCS: A mobility/popularity-based caching strategy for information-centric networks

2014· article· en· W2072399505 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityComputer scienceComputer networkThe InternetCacheMobile deviceInformation-centric networkingCellular networkWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information-Centric Networking (ICN) has a great potential to better support the content distribution over the future Internet. Meanwhile, users with mobile devices will also access ICN, introducing a new challenge to ICN providers to handle such mobile content requests. In this paper, a mobility and popularity-based caching strategy is proposed to increase the cache hit rate through WiFi while people are moving from one WiFi hotspot to another. It thus lowers the network traffic from the local ICN to the outside Internet. Specifically, a precise derivation on the content request rate is provided based on the content popularity and user mobility. A novel caching strategy is further developed based on this derivation for both the mobility-oblivious and mobility-aware scenarios. We evaluate different caching strategies with a trace-driven simulation and our new approach can achieve a 33.84% reduction on the network traffic when compared with the caching strategies only considering the content popularity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207