MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072450316 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.035330

Multiexponential photoluminescence decay of blinking nanocrystal ensembles

2009· article· en· W2072450316 on OpenAlexafffund
Kathleen Dunn, Julien Derr, Trevor Johnston, Mohamed Chaker, Federico Rosei

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceIntermittencyNanocrystalMaterials scienceChemical physicsIntensity (physics)Molecular physicsCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsThermodynamicsPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the relationship between the multiexponential photoluminescence (PL) dynamics of large nanocrystal (NC) ensembles and the intensity intermittency (blinking) characteristic of single NCs. A general model is developed and a simple fitting form derived for the analysis of PL decay curves allowing the extraction of both the intrinsic radiative recombination rate and an intensity intermittence parameter. The analysis is applied to the PL of a series of Si-NCs embedded in silicon oxide matrices yielding a good agreement between extracted and theoretical recombination rates. An excellent agreement is furthermore reported between the range of power-law exponents obtained and those previously determined through both single-NC experiments and current blinking mechanism theory. We suggest that a similar approach may well be fruitful in the analysis of time-resolved PL for a large variety of other carrier-confined materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207