MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072457112 · doi:10.1029/2011jb008889

Seismic and aseismic slip pulses driven by thermal pressurization of pore fluid

2012· article· en· W2072457112 on OpenAlexafffund
Dmitry Garagash

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCabin pressurizationGeologySlip (aerodynamics)Pore water pressureThermalSeismologyGeotechnical engineeringFluid pressureInduced seismicityMechanicsMaterials scienceEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are several lines of evidence that suggest that thermal pressurization (TP) of pore fluid within a low‐permeability fault core may play the key role in the development of earthquake slip. To elucidate effects of TP on spontaneous fault slip, we consider solutions for a steadily propagating slip pulse on a fault with a constant sliding friction, the level of which may reflect other thermally‐activated processes at the rupture front (such as the flash heating on asperities). Upon arrival of the pulse front, essentially undrained‐adiabatic TP takes place during the initial slip acceleration from the locked state with a corresponding reduction of the fault strength. With passage of time, the diminishing rate of heating (due to the reduced fault strength) and increasing rate of hydrothermal diffusion from the shear zone offset TP and result in partial recovery of the strength, slip deceleration and eventual locking and healing of the slip. We show that the rupture speedvr decreases with thickness hof the principal shear zone. For lab‐constrained values of fault‐gouge parameters, the TP‐pulse solution predicts seismic (vr∼ km/s) slip on a millimeter‐to‐cm thin principal shear zone; and aseismic slip withvr ∼ 10 km/day and slip rates 1–2 orders above the plate rate on a relatively thick (h∼ 1 m) shear zone. These and other predictions of the TP‐pulse model are consistent with the independent sets of observational constraints for large crustal and subduction interplate earthquakes, and slow slip transients (North Cascadia), respectively. Locking of the slip soon after the diffusive transport of the heat and pore fluid becomes efficient significantly limits the maximum co‐seismic temperature rise to values well below previous theoretical estimates. As a result, the onset of macroscopic melting and some of thermal decomposition reactions, recently suggested to explain strong co‐seismic fault weakening, are precluded over much of the seismogenic zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207