MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072463203 · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2006.01.009

Rationale and design: The VALsartan In Diastolic Dysfunction (VALIDD) Trial: Evolving the management of diastolic dysfunction in hypertension

2006· article· en· W2072463203 on OpenAlexaff
Rajesh Janardhanan, William Daley, Tasneem Z. Naqvi, Sharon L. Mulvagh, Gerard P. Aurigemma, Michael R. Zile, J. Malcolm O. Arnold, Eunice Artis, Das Purkayastha, James D. Thomas, Scott D. Solomon

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Heart Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiastoleValsartanCardiologyInternal medicineLeft ventricular hypertrophyClinical trialPlaceboBlood pressurePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.077
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.076
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0770.076
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0100.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Heart JournalSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207