MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072466240 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n8p37

Communicative Competency as Teacher’s Integrative Ability for Musical Communication

2015· article· en· W2072466240 on OpenAlex
Inna S. Kobozeva, Марина Петровна Миронова, Nadezhda Ivanovna Chinyakova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Professional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
KeywordsCommunicative competencePsychologyCompetence (human resources)InstitutionCommunicative language teachingPedagogyMusicalHigher educationSociologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceLanguage education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article is devoted to finding of ways of development of communicative competence of students of pedagogical higher education institution. Authors analyzed the main tendencies of researches in this problem area. Authors see development of communicative competence of the teacher as the solution of a question which allows to carry out communication of the teacher with pupils means of music. As a result of research personal signs of communicative competence were revealed and its professional importance is defined. In work diagnostics of level of formation of musical and communicative culture at students of pedagogical higher education institutions is described. These researches were conducted in Federal public budgetary educational institution of higher education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it