MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072466783 · doi:10.1021/jf060506m

Interactions between Bovine β-Lactoglobulin A and Various Bioactive Peptides As Studied by Front-Face Fluorescence Spectroscopy

2006· article· en· W2072466783 on OpenAlexaff
Samira Roufik, Sylvie F. Gauthier, Éric Dufour, Sylvie L. Turgeon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProteins in Food Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorescenceFluorescence spectroscopyChemistrySpectroscopyBiophysicsBeta-lactoglobulinWhey proteinBiochemistryBiologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Front-face fluorescence spectroscopy was used for the first time to study the interactions between bovine beta-lactoglobulin variant A (beta-Lg A) and various beta-Lg-derived bioactive peptides. Fluorescence spectra were recorded for beta-Lg A-peptide mixtures at 25 degrees C and pH 6.8 with an excitation wavelength of 290 nm to characterize the molecular environment of tryptophan (Trp) residues present in the protein but absent in the peptides. Spectra remained unchanged following addition of peptides beta-Lg f92-100 and beta-Lg f125-135, while Phe-Phe interaction between beta-Lg f69-83 molecules interfered with analysis. Addition of beta-Lg f102-105 produced a blue shift (3 nm) and a significant increase in fluorescence intensity, while addition of beta-Lg f142-148 also caused a significant increase in fluorescence intensity but accompanied by a red shift (3 nm). These results indicate that the polarity of the Trp environment in the beta-Lg A structure may be modified differently depending on the peptide added.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicProteins in Food SystemsFrench-language works237,207