MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072468320 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.g.00742

rhBMP-12 Accelerates Healing of Rotator Cuff Repairs in a Sheep Model

2008· article· en· W2072468320 on OpenAlexaff
Howard Seeherman, Joanne Archambault, Scott A. Rodeo, A. Simon Turner, Lisa J. Zekas, Darren DʼAugusta, X Jian Li, Erica Smith, John M. Wozney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotator cuffShouldersMedicineImplantSurgeryHyaluronic acidHumerusSpongeType I collagenHorseBiomedical engineeringNuclear medicineAnatomyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The success rate of rotator cuff repairs is variable. This study was performed to evaluate the ability of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-12 (rhBMP-12), administered in several carriers, to accelerate healing in a sheep model of rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Local retention of tracer amounts of radiolabeled rhBMP-12, added to non-radiolabeled rhBMP-12 delivered in buffer, hyaluronan paste or sponges, or Type-I or Type-I/III collagen sponges was first evaluated with use of gamma scintigraphy in a pilot study of a rat intramuscular implant model. The rhBMP-12/paste and sponge combinations were then evaluated in eight sheep each with unilateral complete detachment and subsequent double-row reattachment of the infraspinatus tendon to the proximal part of the humerus. Contralateral, normal shoulders from sixteen sheep and shoulders in which a repair had been done without administration of rhBMP-12 in fourteen sheep were also evaluated. The rhBMP-12/Type-I and Type-I/III collagen sponge combinations were each evaluated in eight additional sheep on the basis of superior efficacy. The Type-I/III collagen sponge alone was evaluated in ten sheep to examine the effect of a collagen carrier. Ultrasound imaging was performed at four and eight weeks. Radiographic evaluation, mechanical testing, and biochemical evaluation were performed at eight weeks. Histological evaluation was performed on specimens from the sites of selected repairs following mechanical testing. RESULTS: The sponge carriers had longer local retention of rhBMP-12 than did the buffer or paste carriers in the rat models. All of the sheep shoulder-repair groups demonstrated ultrasound evidence of a gap between the tendon and the humeral insertion. The gap length and the cross-sectional area of the repair tissue decreased with time. The mechanical properties of the repairs treated with rhBMP-12 and hyaluronan paste were similar to those of the untreated repairs. The maximum loads for the rhBMP-12/hyaluronan sponge and rhBMP-12/collagen sponge-treated repairs were 2.1 and 2.7 times greater, respectively, than the loads for the untreated repairs and were 33% and 42% of the value for the normal tendon at eight weeks. The maximum loads for the repairs treated with rhBMP-12 and a Type-I or Type-I/III collagen sponge were 2.1 times greater than those for the repairs treated with the Type-I/III collagen sponge alone. Changes in maximum stiffness followed a similar pattern. Histological evaluation demonstrated accelerated healing of the rhBMP-12-treated repairs compared with the untreated repairs. Bone formation was observed in all repairs, and biochemical measurements were not equivalent to those of normal tendon at eight weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of rhBMP-12 in a collagen or hyaluronan sponge resulted in accelerated healing of acute full-thickness rotator cuff repairs in a sheep model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Delivery of rhBMP-12 in several sponge carriers has the potential to accelerate healing of rotator cuff repairs. Accelerated repair may allow shorter rehabilitation and an earlier return to occupational and recreational activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations154
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Joint SurgerySame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207