MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072489891 · doi:10.1592/phco.21.17.1331.34427

Interaction Between <i>N</i>‐Acetylcysteine and Activated Charcoal: Implications for the Treatment of Acetaminophen Poisoning

2001· article· en· W2072489891 on OpenAlexaff
Paul K. Tenenbein, Daniel Sitar, Milton Tenenbein

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActivated charcoalAcetaminophenSalicylic acidCharcoalAcetylcysteineChemistryAdsorptionActivated carbonChromatographyPharmacologyMedicineOrganic chemistryBiochemistryAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if the presence of N-acetylcysteine reduces the ability of activated charcoal to adsorb acetaminophen both in the absence and presence of a coingestant. DESIGN: In vitro laboratory study. SETTING: University hospital research laboratory. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The adsorption of acetaminophen and salicylic acid by activated charcoal in the presence and absence of N-acetylcysteine was measured in vitro. Acetaminophen and salicylic acid analyses were conducted with high-performance liquid chromatography. Adsorption data were compared using the appropriate parametric statistical test. The addition of N-acetylcysteine significantly decreased the binding of acetaminophen by activated charcoal (p<0.005). When salicylic acid was added to simulate a coingestant, N-acetylcysteine significantly decreased salicylate adsorption by charcoal (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of N-acetylcysteine reduces the ability of activated charcoal to adsorb acetaminophen and coingestants. In vivo data will be required to determine the clinical relevance of these interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207