Le conflit identitaire à travers les rhétoriques concurrentes en Ukraine post-soviétique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identity-related conflict viewed through rival idealogical rhetoric in post-Soviet Ukraine In the now-independent Ukraine, historical myths are at the core of political instrumentalization of the past and of vigorous debate on the content and modes of construction of a “national” collective identity. The present Government powers aspire to a nation-State, banking on the quest for a Ukrainian singularity, with a complete break-away from Russianness, and on the ultimate condemnation of the crimes of communism. In complete opposition to this, an alternative discourse found itself on the cultural proximity with the Russians lying in Slavic and Orthodox ties and the legacy, common to all Soviet peoples, of the Victory over fascism. This article draws on ongoing research entailing the cross-reference and comparison of samples of currently maintained public discourse and rhetoric relating to areas of politics, religion, media, or ideology, whether in real or virtual contexts. Comparative study of the threads of logic running through them brought out the most commonly shared collective representations on which the two rival narratives are founded today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".