MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072533794 · doi:10.1139/p08-147

The effect of on-ramp and off-ramp on the one dimensional road with open boundaries

2009· article· en· W2072533794 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelaziz Mhirech, Assia Alaoui Ismaili, H. Ez‐Zahraouy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTopology (electrical circuits)Phase (matter)Plateau (mathematics)Cellular automatonFlux (metallurgy)Flow (mathematics)MechanicsMathematical analysisElectrical engineeringComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of one on-ramp (entry) and one off-ramp (exit) is investigated numerically in a one dimensional cellular automaton traffic flow model, with open boundary conditions, using parallel dynamics. Our aim in this paper is to study how the injection rates α and α 0 and the extraction rates β and β 0 act on the density and flux of cars in a one dimensional road. The priority of occupation at entry site i 1 (removing at exit site i 2 ) is attributed to the particle that entered (was absorbed) the chain. Phase diagrams in (β 0 , α 0 ) and (β, α 0 ) plans are established. For α = 0.1, they show three different topologies in the flow behaviour. The first one corresponds to the presence of four regions, by varying α 0 , namely low-density phase (LDP), intermediate-density phase (IDP), plateau current phase (PCP), and high-density phase (HDP). In the second topology, the intermediate-density phase disappears. The third topology presents only two regions, i.e., low- and high-density phases. For small values of α, the (IDP) and (PCP) disappear, respectively, by increasing β. When increasing α, the fourth topology, corresponding to one phase (HDP), appears for low values of β and β 0 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207