MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072540848 · doi:10.1097/bsd.0b013e31816845bc

Three-dimensional Subclassification of Lenke Type 1 Scoliotic Curves

2009· article· en· W2072540848 on OpenAlexaff
Luc Duong, Jean‐Marc Mac‐Thiong, Farida Chériet, Hubert Labelle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustinePolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of the 3-D shape variability of spinal curve in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OBJECTIVES: To determine the statistical 3-D variability of Lenke type 1 curves and to evaluate clinical parameters that can be integrated to refine the Lenke et al original proposal, and to pave the road for a comprehensive 3-D subclassification of AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several classification systems based on the identification of key features from frontal and sagittal x-rays have been proposed in AIS, but these remain an oversimplification of the complex 3-D deformity because it is only based on 2-D imaging. Clinical 3-D parameter variability has been investigated in previous studies, but has never been considered in the context of the Lenke classification. METHODS: Radiographs of 68 AIS patients with Lenke type 1 curves were reconstructed in 3-dimension using a stereo-radiographic technique and were submitted to a computer algorithm to compute a set of 3-D parameters that can be used to characterize the 3-D curve. Cluster analysis was performed to determine the statistical distribution of 3-D parameters among Lenke 1 curve types. RESULTS: Statistical analysis shows specific 3-D deformation patterns within Lenke type 1 curves, mostly using the best-fit plane or BFP (SD+/-22.9, +/-49.8) and geometric torsion parameters. No significant variability was found using the plane of maximum curvature or PMC. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances in computer vision facilitate the introduction of 3-D reconstruction in a standard clinical setting and can provide more information toward the spine behavior in 3-D space. A direct consequence of commonly used 3-D reconstruction would be to be able to evaluate 3-D indices and to devise a real 3-D classification system from the Lenke et al proposal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Spinal Disorders & TechniquesSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207