The persistence of a large stagnation zone in a developed regional aquifer, southwestern Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An extensive groundwater zone of exceptionally negative δ18O (17.5 to 16.0) exists in a thin, regional, freshwater aquifer between Lake St. Clair and the southern shore of Lake Huron in southwestern Ontario. The zone occurs at the interface between the overlying thick Quaternary clay aquitard of glaciolacustrine origin and the underlying bedrock shale. This isotope signature, which is 7 more negative (lighter) than modern water, indicates a Late Pleistocene origin of the aquifer water. This zone occurs only where the Quaternary aquitard is greater than 35 m thick. In the Quaternary aquitard, the Pleistocene isotope signature extends upward from the aquifer and then has a gradational transition to signature resembling modern water (10) near the ground surface. This regional-scale study of the aquiferaquitard system indicates that the pattern of flow of the aquifer has allowed the persistence of the Pleistocene groundwater since the aquitard was deposited approximately 10 000 years before present. As part of the regional study, a two-dimensional groundwater flow model was used to assess the origin and persistence of the Pleistocene zone under natural conditions. The persistence of the Pleistocene zone was also assessed based on water budgets prepared from aquifer use history and aquiferaquitard parameters. Our study finds that the low yield and poor quality of groundwater in this zone have caused minimal use, resulting in the persistence of the Pleistocene groundwater since the beginning of major aquifer use in the 1940s.Key words: regional aquifer, aquitard, Pleistocene water, stagnation, aquifer use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".