Intimité et acadianité : le fonds Gérald Leblanc, un gisement à exploiter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article met en valeur le potentiel de recherche du fonds Gérald Leblanc. Les manuscrits de Gérald Leblanc témoignent de l’ensemble de sa production littéraire et rendent compte de ses méthodes de travail, des mécanismes de production de ses écrits, des processus qui ont mené à l’émergence de son oeuvre. Son journal intime et sa correspondance constituent un corpus de choix pour plusieurs champs d’études littéraires, anthropologiques et historiques dont les études sur le genre autobiographique, sur la mise en scène du soi, ou les travaux portant sur l’histoire de la correspondance et les réseaux de sociabilité. Le fonds témoigne particulièrement du courant littéraire qui a émergé dans les années 70 en Acadie tout en rappelant le rôle de Leblanc dans l’évolution de la culture acadienne en milieu urbain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".