Synthesis, structure and solution NMR properties of (Ph4P)[M(SeC{O}Tol)3], M = Zn, Cd and Hg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metal selenocarboxylate salts (PPh4)[M(SeC[O]Tol)3] (M = Zn (1), Cd (2) and Hg (3); Tol = C6H4-p-CH3) have been synthesized by reacting Zn(NO3)2 .6H2O, Cd(NO3)2 .4H2O or HgCl2 with (Na+)TolC[O]Se- and PPh4Cl in the ratio of 1 : 4 : 1. The structures of these compounds were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. The crystal structures contain discrete cations and anions. In the each anion, the metal center is bound to three TolC[O]Se ligands, primarily through Se, though some long M...O interactions also occur. NMR spectra (113Cd, 199Hg and 77Se, as appropriate) are reported for solutions of [M(SeC[O]Tol)3]-, and of [M(SeC[O]Tol)3](-) - [M(SC[O]Ph)3]- mixtures (M = Zn-Hg), in CH2Cl2 at reduced temperatures. In addition, ESI-MS data have been obtained for [M(SeC[O]Tol)(3)](-) - [M(SC[O]Ph)3]- mixtures (M = Zn-Hg) in acetone and in CH2Cl2. The NMR and ESI-MS studies show that the complexes [M(SeC[O]Tol)n(SC[O]Ph)(3-n)]- (n= 3-0) persist in solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".