Does the north Atlantic oscillation affect hydrographic properties on the Canadian Atlantic continental shelf?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An analysis of hydrographic data from the eastern Canadian continental shelf indicates that large‐scale spatial patterns of bottom temperature and salinity respond to sustained periods of weak and strong meteorological forcing represented by the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index. Warm, salty (cold, fresh) conditions prevail on the Newfoundland‐Labrador Shelf, the eastern Scotian Shelf and the Gulf of St. Lawrence during periods of negative (positive) NAO anomalies. The opposite response is seen on the central and western Scotian Shelf and in the Gulf of Maine. Comparison of years when the NAO anomaly was positive and had the same sign for at least the two preceding years with those years when the NAO anomaly was negative and had the same sign for at least the two preceding years, shows differences in bottom temperature and salinity, at the same location, of up to approximately 2°C and 0.4. A plausible explanation of the pattern lies in a combination of local forcing and the highly advective nature of the oceanography that responds to NAO forcing. Greater westward transport of Labrador Slope Water along the shelf edge and subsequent on‐shelf penetration of hydrographic anomalies during periods of negative NAO anomalies give rise to the dipole nature of the temperature and salinity patterns. The effects on hydrographic properties appear to be integrated over several years of meteorological forcing, again likely related to advection in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it