MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072607026 · doi:10.1109/icphm.2012.6299543

Software architecture for condition monitoring of mobile underground mining machinery: A framework extensible to intelligent signal processing and analysis

2012· article· en· W2072607026 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan McBain, Markus Timusk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftwareEmbedded systemExtensibilityObject-oriented programmingMATLABSIGNAL (programming language)Real-time computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the mining sector, there are growing calls for the ability to monitor the health of operational assets like structures, mobile underground machinery, and complex stationary equipment. This work focuses on the development of a software architecture to monitor the entire range of industrial and mining equipment - all the while acknowledging the more generic problem of intelligent signal processing having applicability to a much broader class of problem. The implementation of condition monitoring for mobile underground mining equipment relies on previous work by the authors in advancing condition-monitoring techniques for vari able speed and load machinery. The design will permit flexible run-time system configuration with a variety of choices in signal processing and intelligent analysis techniques; it has been demonstrated to work well with an implementation in MATLAB object-oriented programming (OOP) from data collected on a real gearbox subject to varying loads and speeds. This success justifies the advancement of a full-fledged prototype in LabVIEW OOP. The aim is the development of the data analysis layer; the result should integrate seamlessly with such developing industrial standards as the International Rock Excavation Data Exchange Standard (IREDES).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207