MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072634154 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.44.6.1469

NEW DATA ON TYPE-LOCALITY SOROSITE: COMPOSITIONAL VARIATIONS, ZONING, AND A REVISED FORMULA

2006· article· en· W2072634154 on OpenAlexaffvenue
A.Yu. Barkov, Richard Martin, Li-Shian Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersOulun Yliopisto
KeywordsZoningType localityLocalityGeologyType (biology)PaleontologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceLinguisticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report new results of multiple EMP analyses of sorosite from the Baimka Au–PGE placer deposit, western Chukotka, northeastern Russia. It occurs as (1) relatively large (0.2–0.4 mm) euhedral, cryptically zoned hexagonal grains, with Fe–Nirich zones in the core, (2) large irregular or skeletal grains, and (3) elongate subhedral to euhedral (hexagonal), or anhedral micrograins (≤20 m). They all are hosted by native tin (Sb-bearing), and are associated with stistaite Sn1+xSb and herzenbergite SnS. The Fe content of these zoned grains decreases from the center (3 wt.%) toward the edge (≤0.05 wt.%). The Ni content also decreases from the core (1.2 wt.%) to the periphery ( 415°–227°C, the latter being the eutectic temperature in the binary system Cu–Sn. A mineralized mafi c rock (gabbro, gabbro–diorite, or clinopyroxenite) associated with the Yegdegkychsky gabbro – diorite – syenite – monzonite complex in the placer area could be a potential primary source for the sorosite-bearing mineralization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207